Sunday, February 03, 2008

Why do conservatives hate the Constitution?


Titled borrowed from my friend at HipNerd

The above link will take you to an Op-Ed by Richard Clarke - former head of counterterrorism at the National Security Council.

He makes a simple and logical argument that conservatives have trouble understanding. Similarly conservatives have a hard time understanding the constitution guarantees freedom and justice for all: including illegal immigrants, minorities and yes, even our enemies. This is the strength of America, not its weakness and those who would eviscerate and subvert the Constitution – except by legally changing it through the amendment process built into the document - are ipso facto "enemies” of the Constitution as defined by the oaths of office the president and congress swear to upon taking office.

Clarke says; "In order to defeat the violent Islamist extremists who do not believe in human rights, we need not give up the civil liberties, constitutional rights and protections that generations of Americans fought to achieve. We do not need to create Big Brother. With the administration's attempts to erode FISA's legal standing as the exclusive means by which our government can conduct electronic surveillance of U.S. persons on U.S. soil, this is unfortunately the path the president is taking us down."

This government already has all the tools it needs to prevent terrorist acts on the USA. They may not bat 1000% but most Americans, at least those with a SPINE, would be willing to suffer casualties to keep our country from becoming a right wing nut Gestapo dream state. After all more Americans have died for a war started under false pretenses than died in the 9/11 attacks. Get it? George Bush has killed more Americans than Osama Bin Laden.

“We have met the enemy and he is us”

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the link, Frank.

Regarding FISA specifically: It is actually not the greatest protection of our civil rights. I've read that the FISA court has rarely (or never) disapproved requests for warrants to spy, and so is pretty much a blank check. Perhaps the Bush administration has pushed their spying to the point that they thought the FISA court would actually start denying their requests. As weak as it is, FISA definitely should not be weakend

Frank of America said...

I don't disagree - however it is the law of the land, upheld by the courts and until it's changed GWB and co. must comply.